The most argued animation

I have to make a public announcement for this one. I've had the animation up for a year and it still keeps getting the same comments:
Interactive pregnant Latios
-"I thought Latios was a boy, and Latias was a girl"
-"the creepy awesome thing is that all Latios are boys..."
-"latios is Boy You know your sick"
-"uummi dunno what to say? i mean a pregnant latios?? HE'S A GUY!!"
-"i thought latios was a dude?" (I personally never equated "dude" with "male"...)
-"Hold it isn't Latios a boy? Because the last time check it said that Latias was the girl."
-"*blink* latios is a guy *sweatdrop*"
-"latios is aman and latias is the girl but latios is blue made blake no raseisom attended"
-"Isnt LATIOS the boy and LATIAS the girl"
-"Latios only comes in a male form though if you made latios then you should make a pregnant Inuyasha!"

And I should mention I already complained about some comments on this animation over a year ago: [link]

Hey, I want to make this clear:
I made the animation, I make the rules.
That Latios is a female and there should be no questions about it

Can they give me a break? Not everyone has to point out the exact same "problem" again and again. I've seen it already and I already said it isn't a problem. I knew what I was doing.

Still working

I know it's been over 3 weeks since I agreed to make the Kingdra expansion animation. And between then and now I've upload other forms of art. I just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten about it. I'm just working very slowly. It will get done.

The Eevee Girl

Well, that was the original title of my most recent animation. The one of the pregnant Eevee walking. It got an unusual ammount of comments in the first day.

Was that because it was more interesting than my expansion animations? Or just because it was different?

Do you think it would be a good idea to do more similar animations in the future? Or should the Eevee girl remain unique?

I'm not a writer

You know that already, and I've never written a story before. But I want to make an argument to defend some of the people who make characters labelled "mary sue" or "gary stew" or whatever. I think these names refer to invincible characters, characters that get everything they want, character that everyone in the word admires. All that kind of stuff.

I have my characters: Max/Doom, Valentine and (although rarely mentioned) Liviana. They have unwritten stories about them. I realized my own characters have everything they want. Valentine and Max have eachother. Max is a swordmaster, programmer and explorer who finds all the rare, ancient, artefacts in the world. He is descended from an ancient hero and can transform into any of three forms. Valentine has magical powers, and occasionally gets new magical items from Max. Liviana is supposed to be descended from the last king of the wolf tribe before they joined with the humans. She's an expert at history and works in a pole dancing bar.

I know that in a good story, a character must end up having less than what he wanted, he must lose something (or never gain something he wanted or needed), things aren't perfect. Nobody can be particuarily special. And I just don't want to admit to that. I want my characters to be the way I like them best. That is what I have to say in defense of the people with that kind of characters.

Now here's what I have to say against them. It's pretty clear: Don't write stories. I'm not a writer, neither are you.

Pictures colored for me

Thanks a lot to the people who colored my sketches. Here they are: